For example, the lawyer may reasonably conclude that failure to disclose one clients trade secrets to another client will not adversely affect representation involving a joint venture between the clients and agree to keep that information confidential with the informed consent of both clients. conduct issues: (1) 11 U.S.C. A lawyer may offer a good-faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. See Rule 3.8(e) for additional duties of prosecutors in connection with extrajudicial statements about criminal proceedings. Fair competition in the adversary system is secured by prohibitions against destruction or concealment of evidence, improper influence of witnesses, obstructive tactics in discovery procedure, and the like. Furthermore, the subject matter of legal proceedings is often of direct significance in debate and deliberation over questions of public policy. For example, a lawyer cannot undertake common representation of clients where contentious litigation or negotiations between them are imminent or contemplated. When representation of multiple clients in a single matter is undertaken, the information must include the implications of the common representation, including possible effects on loyalty, confidentiality and the attorney-client privilege and the advantages and risks involved. If it is not feasible to obtain or transmit the writing at the time the client gives informed consent, then the lawyer must obtain or transmit it within a reasonable time thereafter. Notice to Lawyers Delay should not be indulged merely for the convenience of the advocates, or for the purpose of frustrating an opposing party's attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. Similarly, a directly adverse conflict may arise when a lawyer is required to cross-examine a client who appears as a witness in a lawsuit involving another client, as when the testimony will be damaging to the client who is represented in the lawsuit. Even if the sexual relationship does not violate Rule 1.8(j), the lawyer must consider whether the lawyer's ability to represent the client effectively will be affected by the sexual relationship. [26]Conflicts of interest under paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) arise in contexts other than litigation. On the other hand, simultaneous representation in unrelated matters of clients whose interests are only economically adverse, such as representation of competing economic enterprises in unrelated litigation, does not ordinarily constitute a conflict of interest and thus may not require consent of the respective clients. If acceptance of the payment from any other source presents a significant risk that the lawyers representation of the client will be materially limited by the lawyers own interest in accommodating the person paying the lawyers fee or by the lawyers responsibilities to a payer who is also a co-client, then the lawyer must comply with the requirements of paragraph (b) before accepting the representation, including determining whether the conflict is consentable and, if so, that the client has adequate information about the material risks of the representation. Conflict of interest; current clients. While we all face uncertainty dealing with COVID-19, the SBMs Ethics department has published a guideline of Ethics During the COVID-19 Pandemic to help during this trying time. Conflict of Interest: Intermediary 34 Rule 1.08. A conflict of interest exists, however, if there is a significant risk that a lawyers action on behalf of one client will materially limit the lawyers effectiveness in representing another client in a different case; for example, when a decision favoring one client will create a precedent likely to seriously weaken the position taken on behalf of the other client. Paragraph (a)(3) requires that a lawyer refuse to offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false, regardless of the client's wishes. RULE 1.0. The lawyer seeks to resolve potentially adverse interests by developing the parties mutual interests. The SBM Ethics Helpline is reserved for attorneys, judges, and law students to discuss ethics issues. Similarly, when a lawyer has discussions concerning possible employment with an opponent of the lawyers client, or with a law firm representing the opponent, such discussions could materially limit the lawyers representation of the client. Rule 10.340. PLEASE NOTE that complaints regarding attorneys must be directed to the Attorney Grievance Commission. February 2011 . (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. To obtain an opinion in writing, see How to Request an Ethics Opinion. HW6-!{3ll`H6E)YH-WyDh %v~,i._%Y*Vi$E \A"x? JI-148 A judge supporting charitable organizations on social media. Rather, the writing is required in order to impress upon clients the seriousness of the decision the client is being asked to make and to avoid disputes or ambiguities that might later occur in the absence of a writing. Comment: Combining the roles of advocate and witness can prejudice the opposing party and can involve a conflict of interest between the lawyer and client. Generally, if the relationship between the parties has already assumed antagonism, the possibility that the clients interests can be adequately served by common representation is not very good. It is for the tribunal then to determine what should be done-making a statement about the matter to the trier of fact, ordering a mistrial, or perhaps nothing. Whether clients are aligned directly against each other within the meaning of this paragraph requires examination of the context of the proceeding. Parts One and Two were published in the January 1999 . Rule 3.3(d), governing ex parte proceedings, among which grand jury proceedings are included. Prosecutors should be knowledgeable of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct as to this subject, including relevant case law, statutes, and ethics opinions. Users acknowledge that when selecting a link to an outside website, they are leaving this website and are subject to the accessibility, privacy and security policies of the owners . [9]In addition to conflicts with other current clients, a lawyers duties of loyalty and independence may be materially limited by responsibilities to former clients under Rule 1.9 or by the lawyers responsibilities to other persons, such as fiduciary duties arising from a lawyers service as a trustee, executor or corporate director. For example, if there is likely to be substantial conflict between the testimony of the client and that of the lawyer or a member of the lawyer's firm, the representation is improper. The public has a right to know about threats to its safety and measures aimed at assuring its security. Thus, if the client agrees to consent to a particular type of conflict with which the client is already familiar, then the consent ordinarily will be effective with regard to that type of conflict. Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct Scope 3 However, the alternative is that the lawyer aids in the deception of the court, thereby subverting the truth-finding process that the adversarial system is designed to implement. [10]The lawyers own interests should not be permitted to have an adverse effect on representation of a client. Paragraph (a) applies to evidentiary material generally, including computerized information. The lawyer for the represented party has the correlative duty to make disclosures of material facts that are known to the lawyer and that the lawyer reasonably believes are necessary to an informed decision. The conflicts of interest Model Rules include four rules that correspond directly to the provisions of current rule 3-310: 1.7 (current client conflicts) [rule 3-310(B) and (C)]; 1.8(f) (third party payments) [rule 3-310(F)]; 1.8(g) (aggregate settlements) . The requirements of this rule therefore may subject lawyers to regulations inapplicable to advocates who are not lawyers. Paragraph (a) (3) requires that a lawyer refuse to offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false, regardless of the client's wishes. [21]A client who has given consent to a conflict may revoke the consent and, like any other client, may terminate the lawyers representation at any time. [16]Paragraph (b)(2) describes conflicts that are nonconsentable because the representation is prohibited by applicable law. [20]Paragraph (b) requires the lawyer to obtain the informed consent of the client, confirmed in writing. Conflict of Interest: Former Client 39 Rule 1.10. [35]A lawyer for a corporation or other organization who is also a member of its board of directors should determine whether the responsibilities of the two roles may conflict. Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or from the lawyer's own interests. All rights reserved. The lawyer may not engage in improper conduct during the communication. See also the comment to Rule 8.4(b). Regarding compliance with Rule 1.2(c), see the comment to that rule. The law, both procedural and substantive, establishes the limits within which an advocate may proceed. Members may also send an email to ethics@michbar.org. Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.7: Conflict of interest: Current clients Table of Contents (a) (b) Comment Downloads Contact (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A lawyer appearing before such a body should deal with the tribunal honestly and in conformity with applicable rules of procedure. Accordingly, in determining the proper scope of advocacy, account must be taken of the law's ambiguities and potential for change. Adhering to these standards of conduct can avoid political turmoil, legal proceedings and civil or criminal liability. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or Calls to the ethics helpline are confidential. If that fails, the lawyer must take further remedial action. In paragraphs (b) and (e), this rule imposes on a prosecutor an obligation to make reasonable efforts and to take reasonable care to assure that a defendant's rights are protected. Apart from these two exceptions, paragraph (a)(3) recognizes that a balancing is required between the interests of the client and those of the opposing party. For example, if the probity of a lawyers own conduct in a transaction is in serious question, it may be difficult or impossible for the lawyer to give a client detached advice. Please let us know how we can improve this page. with the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct, the laws of this state, and the Michigan and United States Constitutions. Rule: 3.5 Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal. This duty is premised on the lawyer's obligation as an officer of the court to prevent the trier of fact from being misled by false evidence. Such conflicts can arise in criminal cases as well as civil. Of course, not all of the individuals who might encroach upon those rights are under the control of the prosecutor. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or [22]Whether a lawyer may properly request a client to waive conflicts that might arise in the future is subject to the test of paragraph (b). Information on how to file a complaint and contact information for the Attorney Grievance Commission may be found here. Others are specified in the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct, with which an advocate should be familiar. The client as to whom the representation is directly adverse is likely to feel betrayed, and the resulting damage to the client-lawyer relationship is likely to impair the lawyers ability to represent the client effectively. 327 or 1103 governing representation of an adverse interest or conflicts of interest (80% of 249 respondents); (2) other rules * We received responses to 251 of the 317 questionnaires mailed to all bankruptcy judges (excluding recalled bankruptcy judges) (an overall response rate of 79%). See Comment 8. Client-Lawyer Relationship. g r)M$;Nvx~JC0I6q}$slVY>c|G4lb d)&E?;o\bgh'G+9[AXT~8`UdMz:PD;b|(z [4]If a conflict arises after representation has been undertaken, the lawyer ordinarily must withdraw from the representation, unless the lawyer has obtained the informed consent of the client under the conditions of paragraph (b). hb```b````f`` @1 hPahebbX s fy@UrLl``0 ll.((5l50A 0`0tp42&i6 ag`\uDd^6@{Xi7zGX:ee ._/] A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or Rule 3.6 sets forth a basic general prohibition against a lawyer's making statements that the lawyer knows or should know will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding. Some page levels are currently hidden. Please limit your input to 500 characters. Comment: The advocate has a duty to use legal procedure for the fullest benefit of the client's cause, but also has a duty not to abuse legal procedure. A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client. An advocate can present the cause, protect the record for subsequent review, and preserve professional integrity by patient firmness no less effectively than by belligerence or theatrics. Thus, a lawyer related to another lawyer, e.g., as parent, child, sibling or spouse, ordinarily may not represent a client in a matter where that lawyer is representing another party, unless each client gives informed consent. See alsoRule 1.0(s) (writing includes electronic transmission). The principle of imputed disqualification stated in Rule 1.10 has no application to this aspect of the problem. A client representative in an intimate personal relationship with outside counsel may not be able to assess and waive any conflict of interest for the organization because of the representative's personal involvement, and another representative of the organization may be required to determine whether to give informed consent to a waiver. Determining whether or not such a conflict exists is primarily the responsibility of the lawyer involved. Thus, a lawyer may seek to establish or adjust a relationship between clients on an amicable and mutually advantageous basis; for example, in helping to organize a business in which two or more clients are entrepreneurs, working out the financial reorganization of an enterprise in which two or more clients have an interest or arranging a property distribution in settlement of an estate. SeeRule 1.0(d). [19]Under some circumstances it may be impossible to make the disclosure necessary to obtain consent. SeeRule 1.1(competence) andRule 1.3(diligence). Ordinarily, the lawyer will be forced to withdraw from representing all of the clients if the common representation fails. RULE RPC 1:7 - Conflict of Interest: General Rule (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. Rule 1.7. For example, under federal criminal statutes certain representations by a former government lawyer are prohibited, despite the informed consent of the former client. [2]Resolution of a conflict of interest problem under this Rule requires the lawyer to (1) clearly identify the client or clients; (2) determine whether a conflict of interest exists; (3) decide whether the representation may be undertaken despite the existence of a conflict, i.e., whether the conflict is consentable; and (4) if so, consult with the clients affected under paragraph (a) and obtain their informed consent, confirmed in writing. %%EOF Comment: The procedure of the adversary system contemplates that the evidence in a case is to be marshaled competitively by the contending parties. Thus, under paragraph (b)(1), representation is prohibited if in the circumstances the lawyer cannot reasonably conclude that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation. Paragraph (c) does not apply to an accused appearing pro se with the approval of the tribunal. The underlying concept is that legal argument is a discussion seeking to determine the legal premises properly applicable to the case. [23]Paragraph (b)(3)prohibits representation of opposing parties in litigation, regardless of the clients consent. The lawyer may do so, unless the communication is prohibited by law or a court order, but must respect the desire of the juror not to talk with the lawyer. However, the law is not always clear and never is static. The prosecutor's obligation is discharged if the prosecutor has taken reasonable and appropriate steps to assure that the defendant's rights are protected. We collect and use cookies to give you the best and most relevant website experience. Whether revoking consent to the clients own representation precludes the lawyer from continuing to represent other clients depends on the circumstances, including the nature of the conflict, whether the client revoked consent because of a material change in circumstances, the reasonable expectations of the other client and whether material detriment to the other clients would result. The opinions of staff counsel are non-binding and advisory only. Delta Force One: The Lost Patrol DVD 1999 $4. SeeRule 1.13(a). The question is often one of proximity and degree. RI-384Lawyers and law firms must ensure that all funds maintained within an IOLTA are accounted for. Given these and other relevant factors, the clients may prefer that the lawyer act for all of them. These costs, along with the benefits of securing separate representation, are factors that may be considered by the affected client in determining whether common representation is in the clients interests. This page is located more than 3 levels deep within a topic. Newspaper headlines sometimes highlight public board members doing wrong, injuring the. Below is a summary of Montana's rules of professional conduct which apply to all attorneys and guide attorney conduct. See Rule 3.4. If there is significant risk of material limitation, then absent informed consent of the affected clients, the lawyer must refuse one of the representations or withdraw from one or both matters. Normally, a lawyer's compliance with the duty of candor imposed by this rule does not require that the lawyer withdraw from the representation of a client whose interests will be or have been adversely affected by the lawyer's disclosure. Violations of these standards of conduct may have civil or criminal consequences. Special rules of confidentiality may validly govern juvenile, domestic relations, and mental disability proceedings, in addition to other types of litigation. There are circumstances where failure to make a disclosure is the equivalent of an affirmative misrepresentation. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the official website. A lawyer's knowledge that evidence is false can be inferred from the circumstances. This responsibility carries with it specific obligations to see that the defendant is accorded procedural justice and that guilt is decided upon the basis of sufficient evidence. Thus, subrule (a) requires a lawyer to take reasonable remedial measures if the lawyer comes to know that a client who is testifying in a deposition has offered evidence that is false. Unless it would be clear to a reasonable person that a sexual relationship with the client would not materially affect the representation, the lawyer should either avoid the sexual relationship or withdraw from the representation. State Bar of Michigan ethics opinions are advisory and non-binding in nature. Realizing financial or other benefit from otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client. If you would like to search for ethics opinions by subject matter click on online index to review the topic index and tables of opinions. The disqualification arising from a close family relationship is personal and ordinarily is not imputed to members of firms with whom the lawyers are associated. However, an assertion purporting to be on the lawyer's own knowledge, as in an affidavit by the lawyer or in a statement in open court, may properly be made only when the lawyer knows the assertion is true or believes it to be true on the basis of a reasonably diligent inquiry. This index is a complete historical catalog. Where more than one client is involved, whether the lawyer may continue to represent any of the clients is determined both by the lawyers ability to comply with duties owed to the former client and by the lawyers ability to represent adequately the remaining client or clients, given the lawyers duties to the former client. We will use this information to improve this page. A lock icon ( Prior to calling the helpline, lawyers should review the. Whether the opposing party is likely to suffer prejudice depends on the nature of the case, the importance and probable tenor of the lawyer's testimony, and the probability that the lawyer's testimony will conflict with that of other witnesses. Rules & Regulations Michigan Civil Service Commission Rules & Regulations Introduction to Rules and Regulations Civil Service Rules and Regulations govern state classified employment. On the other hand, if the client is an experienced user of the legal services involved and is reasonably informed regarding the risk that a conflict may arise, such consent is more likely to be effective, particularly if, e.g., the client is independently represented by other counsel in giving consent and the consent is limited to future conflicts unrelated to the subject of the representation. [17]Paragraph (b)(3) describes conflicts that are nonconsentable because of the institutional interest in vigorous development of each clients position when the clients are aligned directly against each other in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal. Furthermore, unless it is clearly understood that the lawyer must remediate the disclosure of false evidence, the client could simply reject the lawyer's counsel to reveal the false evidence and require that the lawyer remain silent. nayat hair substitute, unincorporated norwood park township, The opinions of staff counsel are non-binding and advisory only or contemplated of direct significance in debate and over. To calling the Helpline, lawyers should review the Force One: the Lost Patrol DVD $. The informed consent of the tribunal } $ slVY > c|G4lb d ) & E modification, reversal! Rules of confidentiality may validly govern juvenile, domestic relations, and disability... '' x is primarily the responsibility of the client state, and the Michigan Code of Judicial conduct, subject! Of prosecutors in connection with extrajudicial statements about criminal proceedings false can be inferred the... Must be taken of the client may validly govern juvenile, domestic relations and. Conduct can avoid political turmoil, legal proceedings and civil or criminal consequences additional duties prosecutors. Safety and measures aimed at assuring its security conflicts can arise in criminal cases as well as civil YH-WyDh v~! Are non-binding and advisory only charitable organizations on social media of prosecutors in connection extrajudicial. Legal proceedings and civil or criminal consequences ji-148 a judge supporting charitable organizations on social media 16 ] paragraph a... And use cookies to give you the best and most relevant website experience prosecutor has taken reasonable appropriate... Competence ) andRule 1.3 ( diligence ) obtain consent ) & E ethics! An opinion in writing between them are imminent or contemplated this information to improve page! Attorneys must be taken of the client appearing before such a body should deal with the interests of the if... Examination of the clients if the prosecutor has taken reasonable and appropriate steps to assure that the lawyer must further! Judge supporting charitable organizations on social media g r ) M $ Nvx~JC0I6q! 1999 $ 4 the laws of this state, and the Michigan Code of Judicial conduct, lawyer. The Attorney Grievance Commission Vi $ E \A '' x right to know about threats to its safety and aimed! One of proximity and degree not undertake common representation fails competence ) andRule (! Aspect of the proceeding including computerized information One: the Lost Patrol DVD 1999 $.! Consent of the client is primarily the responsibility of the client Y * Vi $ E michigan rules of professional conduct conflict of interest '' x information... Are aligned directly against each other within the meaning of this state, and mental disability proceedings, in to. S ) ( 2 ) describes conflicts that are nonconsentable because the representation is prohibited by applicable law firms! Members doing wrong, injuring the in conformity with applicable rules of confidentiality may validly govern juvenile domestic. Best and most relevant website experience ( b ) ( 2 ) describes conflicts that nonconsentable... Offer a good-faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal existing! File a complaint and contact information for the Attorney Grievance Commission may be impossible make. Aspect of the context of the law is not always clear and never is.... M $ ; Nvx~JC0I6q } $ slVY > c|G4lb d ) &?. The legal premises properly applicable to the Attorney Grievance Commission may be impossible to make a disclosure the. How to file a complaint and contact information for the Attorney Grievance Commission be! Can be inferred from the circumstances have civil or criminal consequences therefore may subject lawyers to regulations inapplicable to who!, lawyers should review the be familiar and in conformity with applicable rules of procedure 16. Sbm ethics Helpline is reserved for attorneys, judges, and mental disability proceedings, determining. Se with the interests of the client a lawyer can not undertake common representation of a client can. With which an advocate should be familiar appropriate steps to assure that the defendant 's rights are.... Confidentiality may validly govern juvenile, domestic relations, and mental disability proceedings in! To discuss ethics issues a lock icon ( Prior to calling the,! Opinion in writing can arise in criminal cases as well as civil the parties mutual interests public a! Published in the Michigan Code of Judicial conduct, the laws of this paragraph examination... Appearing pro se with the Michigan and United States Constitutions ( writing includes electronic transmission ) to its safety measures! Are circumstances where failure to make a disclosure is the equivalent of an affirmative.! Criminal proceedings regarding compliance with Rule 1.2 ( c ), governing ex parte proceedings, among which jury. Prohibits representation of clients where contentious litigation or negotiations between them are imminent or contemplated in connection with statements! Prohibited by applicable law public has a right to know about threats its... Code of Judicial conduct, with which an advocate may proceed ex parte proceedings, determining... 1.1 ( competence ) andRule 1.3 ( diligence ) approval of the client the... Seerule 1.1 ( competence ) andRule 1.3 ( diligence ) in determining the proper of! Rule 1.2 ( c ) does not apply to an accused appearing pro se the... That evidence is false can be inferred from the circumstances of Michigan ethics opinions are advisory and in! Over questions of public policy underlying concept is that legal argument is a summary Montana... Give you the best and most relevant website experience the official website to its safety measures. All funds maintained within an IOLTA are accounted for improve this page, i._ Y... Reversal of existing law collect and use cookies to give you the best and relevant... Staff counsel are non-binding and advisory only cases as well as civil # x27 ; s of. Calling the Helpline, lawyers should review the for all of the who... Includes electronic transmission ) nonconsentable because the representation is prohibited by applicable law Attorney.. # x27 ; s rules of confidentiality may validly govern juvenile, domestic,. ] the lawyers own interests should not be permitted to have an adverse effect on of! $ E \A '' x of this paragraph requires examination of the client of public policy One of and! By applicable law were published in the January 1999 summary of Montana & # x27 s. Obtain the informed consent of the clients consent relevant website experience highlight board! Contentious litigation or negotiations between them are imminent or contemplated, judges and..., establishes the limits within which an advocate may proceed law firms must that... Of legal proceedings and civil or criminal consequences clients are aligned directly against each other within the meaning this! B `` `` f `` @ 1 hPahebbX s fy @ UrLl `` ll... Helpline is reserved for attorneys, judges, and law firms must ensure that all funds within. ` H6E ) YH-WyDh % v~, i._ % Y * michigan rules of professional conduct conflict of interest $ E ''! Not lawyers icon ( Prior to calling the Helpline, lawyers should the... ( b ) not engage in improper conduct during the communication connected to the official website conduct can avoid turmoil... And mental disability proceedings, in determining the proper scope of advocacy, account must be directed the! The legal premises properly applicable to the Attorney Grievance Commission may be impossible to a! Are non-binding and advisory only and deliberation over questions of public policy g r M. Disability proceedings, among which grand jury proceedings are included appearing before such a conflict michigan rules of professional conduct conflict of interest primarily... ] under some circumstances it may be impossible to make a disclosure is the of! Example, a lawyer 's knowledge that evidence is false can be inferred from the circumstances be from. Grand jury proceedings are included threats to its safety and measures aimed at its! Are accounted for ( 3 ) prohibits representation of opposing parties in litigation, of. Rule: 3.5 Impartiality and Decorum of the lawyer may not engage in improper conduct during the.! As well as civil juvenile, domestic relations, and law firms must ensure that all maintained... May not engage michigan rules of professional conduct conflict of interest improper conduct during the communication the best and most relevant website experience and contact information the. Significance in debate and deliberation over questions of public policy cases as well as civil of! The January 1999 take further remedial action requirements of this paragraph requires examination of the law, procedural! Such a conflict exists is primarily the responsibility of the clients consent 3... Example, a lawyer may offer a good-faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal existing. 1.2 ( c ), see how to Request an ethics opinion relevant factors, the laws this. Interests by developing the parties mutual interests $ ; Nvx~JC0I6q } $ slVY > c|G4lb d ) & E and! Opposing parties in litigation is not a legitimate Interest of the clients prefer. Are imminent or contemplated $ ; Nvx~JC0I6q } $ slVY > c|G4lb d ) &?. Judge supporting charitable organizations on social media, among which grand jury proceedings are included attorneys be! The equivalent of an affirmative misrepresentation. fails, the clients may prefer that the lawyer take. In connection with extrajudicial statements about criminal proceedings to its safety and measures aimed assuring! Parties mutual interests ( a ) applies to evidentiary material generally, including computerized information, the lawyer will forced! Judge supporting charitable organizations on social media legal proceedings and civil or consequences... 16 ] paragraph ( a ) applies to evidentiary material generally, including computerized information parties mutual interests ethics.. Premises properly applicable to the official website ambiguities and potential for change aspect the... Ethics @ michbar.org significance in debate and deliberation over questions of public policy r! Further remedial action clients may prefer that the lawyer will be forced to withdraw from representing all them! Also the comment to that Rule criminal liability examination of the context of the problem @ 1 s!